From 0ea85d188599efe7ffcf72430b1451d9b4d9aa22 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Juicysteak117 <20595808+Juicysteak117@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2025 08:32:18 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] t
---
export/index.html | 2 +-
export/pghrt.pdf | 1413 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
pghrt.tex | 2 +-
3 files changed, 707 insertions(+), 710 deletions(-)
diff --git a/export/index.html b/export/index.html
index 897aad4..7689b90 100644
--- a/export/index.html
+++ b/export/index.html
@@ -1937,7 +1937,7 @@
Originally I linked a document here but I opted to remove it due to a number of faults that can be misleading. The problem with progesterone is that literally nobody agrees about a single aspect of it. I don’t know a single source or study that people agree is good. Hell, people don’t even agree if the word starts with the letter “P”. The crucial thing to know is that progesterone is not strictly required for full feminization or good breast development, but assuming that it’s not contraindicated for you, it’s probably worth taking.
-
It should be noted that for the entire category of progestogens there are countless myths and falsehoods invented whole cloth by both proponents and detractors alike which does not make discerning truth from the already-sloppy scholarship any easier. Fantastical claims of magical benefits and fearmongering of alleged risks based on nothing are both equally unhelpful, although the later is worse in my opinion when comes from a medical authority, whether neglectful or malicious.
+
It should be noted that for the entire category of progestogens there are countless myths and falsehoods invented whole cloth by both proponents and detractors alike which does not make discerning truth from the already-sloppy scholarship any easier. Fantastical claims of magical benefits and fearmongering of alleged risks based on nothing are both equally unhelpful, although the latter is worse in my opinion when comes from a medical authority, whether neglectful or malicious.